Stacktape logoStacktape vs. Render logoRender

Render and Stacktape both provide developer-friendly deployment platforms, but differ significantly in infrastructure ownership and service breadth.

Stacktape logoStacktape
Render logoRender
Infrastructure ownershipYour AWS accountRender platform
Minimum cost for web app~$7$7 (Starter tier)
Cost modelAWS costs + % feePlan + compute costs
Up to $100,000 infree credits
Static site hosting
Web services (containers)
Background workers
Cron jobs
Serverless functions
Cron jobs only
PostgreSQL databases
MySQL/Aurora databases
NoSQL (DynamoDB)
Redis/Key-Value Store
Object storage (S3)
Persistent disks only
Search (ElasticSearch/OpenSearch)
Messaging (SNS/SQS/EventBridge)
Infrastructure as Code
Render Blueprints
TypeScript configuration
Private networking
Global CDNCloudFrontBuilt-in
Auto-scaling
Preview environments
Free tier

Infrastructure ownership: Your AWS account vs. Render's platform

Render operates their own cloud infrastructure, while Stacktape deploys directly to your AWS account. This fundamental difference affects pricing, vendor lock-in, and the scope of services available.

With Stacktape, you own your infrastructure, get direct AWS billing, and can migrate away without losing your resources. Render keeps you within their managed ecosystem.

Service scope: Curated vs. comprehensive

Render offers a carefully curated set of services designed to work seamlessly together: web services, static sites, background workers, Postgres, and Redis. This creates a cohesive experience but limits options.

Stacktape provides access to the entire AWS ecosystem - including multiple database types (RDS, Aurora, DynamoDB), storage services (S3), messaging (SNS, SQS), search (OpenSearch), and 20+ other services.

Serverless capabilities

Render's serverless options are limited to scheduled cron jobs. All other services run as always-on containers, even when not actively serving traffic.

Stacktape supports AWS Lambda functions for true serverless computing - perfect for APIs, event processing, and background tasks that only run when needed. This can result in significant cost savings for variable workloads.

Infrastructure as Code approach

Both platforms support Infrastructure as Code, but with different scopes. Render's Blueprints (render.yaml) configure their specific services and deployment pipeline.

Stacktape's IaC covers your entire AWS infrastructure and can be written in YAML, JSON, or TypeScript. It's extensible with CloudFormation and provides deeper infrastructure control.

Cost structure and transparency

Render uses a platform-based pricing model with monthly plans plus compute costs. While simple to understand, this can become expensive at scale, especially for data-intensive applications.

Stacktape provides transparent AWS pricing plus a percentage fee. You get detailed AWS cost breakdowns and can optimize spending using AWS's mature cost management tools.

Deployment and scaling

Render excels at simplicity with automatic deployments from Git and built-in autoscaling. Their preview environments and zero-downtime deployments provide excellent developer experience.

Stacktape offers similar Git deployment capabilities while providing more granular control over AWS auto-scaling policies and deployment strategies through AWS services.

Monthly costs

Stacktape logo

Small

question-mark
Stacktape logo

Medium

question-mark
Stacktape logo

Large

question-mark
Render logo

Small

question-mark
Render logo

Medium

question-mark
Render logo

Large

question-mark

Want to give it a shot?

You can deploy your first app to AWS in less than 30 minutes.

Have a question? We're here for you.

Chat with us

Book a meeting

info@stacktape.com

Stay in touch